Re: C99 feature and MSVC v16

2014-11-12 Thread Gisle Vanem
Andy Moreton wrote: Don't expect any C support in MSVC that isn't required by C++ standards. I don't really care about C-99+ (or let alone C++). I love MSVC for it's speed compared to any gcc version. And PCB debug-format and PCH, etc. etc. So please continue to support it. -- --gv

Re: C99 feature and MSVC v16

2014-11-11 Thread Andy Moreton
On Mon 10 Nov 2014, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks, I installed something along those lines. I see that MSVC finally > started supporting declarations-after-statements last year (see below) -- > what, was Microsoft trying to set a record for being behind the times? > > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog

Re: C99 feature and MSVC v16

2014-11-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, I installed something along those lines. I see that MSVC finally started supporting declarations-after-statements last year (see below) -- what, was Microsoft trying to set a record for being behind the times? http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/06/28/c-11-14-stl-features-fixes

C99 feature and MSVC v16

2014-11-10 Thread Gisle Vanem
Hi list. I managed to build gnulib using MSVC v16 (i.e. Visual Studio 2010 Express). All was okay except for a little C99-feature (of data after code which my v16 doesn't support). So can you please apply this patch? --- orig/lib/fts.c 2014-11-08 12:19:14 + +++ lib/fts.c2014-11-08