Re: gitlog-to-changelog option --tear-off

2012-02-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:48, j...@meyering.net said: > >> Hard-coding "--"... My point was that we may not want to hard-code "--". What if someone includes email with a "--" line followed by a signature? ... > Okay. Here comes the fixed patch: > > >>From 816b5f0f0928e257f7a4d7

Re: gitlog-to-changelog option --tear-off

2012-02-16 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:48, j...@meyering.net said: > Hard-coding "--"... Right. I can't think of a ChangeLog line which ends in "--\s*". Commonly "--" is used as the prefix for an option; ie. directly followed by non-white space. The option list terminator "--" might be used but then it should

Re: gitlog-to-changelog option --tear-off

2012-02-12 Thread Jim Meyering
Werner Koch wrote: > Is there a chance that my patch will be applied? Hi Werner, Thanks for the patch. > Subject: [PATCH] gitlog-to-changelog: add option --tear-off. > > This option allows to have blurbs in a commit messages, which shall > not be copied to the ChangeLog. It can also be used to s

gitlog-to-changelog option --tear-off

2012-02-11 Thread Werner Koch
Hi! Is there a chance that my patch will be applied? Shalom-Salam, Werner --- Begin Message --- Hi, I just released the first GnuPG version without a ChangeLog. I used a slightly modified gitlog-to-changelog version and would like to see that feature in gnulib, proper. Shalom-Salam,