On 07/03/2013 11:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
[...]
> on earlier license requests, and given that the code is ultimately
> assigned to the FSF, I've gone ahead and made these changes.
I don't know if it is applicable in that specific case, but I had been
explicitly told by Stallman that GNU maintai
On 05/29/2013 08:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Libvirt would like to use the nproc module to determine the number of
> available processors. This module is currently LGPLv3+, but libvirt
> would require LGPLv2+; it can be argued that since
> sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) is provided by glibc (LGPLv2+
Jim Meyering writes:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> It's fine with me, too.
>
> Fine with me, too.
fine with me.
--
Giuseppe
Paul Eggert wrote:
> It's fine with me, too.
Fine with me, too.
It's fine with me, too.
Libvirt would like to use the nproc module to determine the number of
available processors. This module is currently LGPLv3+, but libvirt
would require LGPLv2+; it can be argued that since
sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) is provided by glibc (LGPLv2+), the real
value in this module is merely in prov
