Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: mbrtowc.m4 on mingw32

2005-07-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > Yes, if the current Autoconf macro works > for Bruno, we should simply use a copy of it in gnulib. Yes, this macro works on mingw as well. I committed this patch. 2005-07-05 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * mbrtowc.m4 (gl_FUNC_MBRTOWC): Upgrade to version from cu

Re: mbrtowc.m4 on mingw32

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A copy of the macro is attached below; does it work for you? Thanks for suggesting that. Yes, if the current Autoconf macro works for Bruno, we should simply use a copy of it in gnulib. ___ bug-gnulib mailin

Re: mbrtowc.m4 on mingw32

2005-07-04 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Bruno, On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > On mingw32, mbrtowc.m4 "detects" that mbrtowc() exists, leading to > link errors. Actually, mbrtowc() does not exist on this system, > it's only declared in but not actually implemented under > this name. why cannot we

mbrtowc.m4 on mingw32

2005-07-04 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, On mingw32, mbrtowc.m4 "detects" that mbrtowc() exists, leading to link errors. Actually, mbrtowc() does not exist on this system, it's only declared in but not actually implemented under this name. config.log shows this: configure:26506: checking whether mbrtowc and mbstate_t are properly d