Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > due to the failure of this assertion:
> >
> > ASSERT (LDBL_MIN_EXP<= DBL_MIN_EXP);
> >
> > It fails because of these numbers:
> >
> > $ :|gcc -dD -E -include stddef.h -|grep -E 'L?DBL_MIN_EXP'
> > #define __DBL_MIN_EXP__ (-1021)
> > #define __LDBL_MIN_EX
On 08/31/2011 05:48 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
The test-float test is failing on ppc64 with:
gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC)
(albeit an aging Fedora 12 system)
due to the failure of this assertion:
ASSERT (LDBL_MIN_EXP<= DBL_MIN_EXP);
It fails because of these
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 04:48 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> The test-float test is failing on ppc64 with:
>>
>> gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC)
>> (albeit an aging Fedora 12 system)
>>
>> due to the failure of this assertion:
>>
>> ASSERT (LDBL_MIN_EXP <=
Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I propose to comment out that test for now, just prior
>> to the coreutils-8.13 pre-release snapshot.
>
> But you are not done with commenting out the assertion.
>
> The programs 'printf', 'seq', and 'sort' assume that a 'double' number
> can be lossles
Jim Meyering wrote:
> I propose to comment out that test for now, just prior
> to the coreutils-8.13 pre-release snapshot.
But you are not done with commenting out the assertion.
The programs 'printf', 'seq', and 'sort' assume that a 'double' number
can be losslessly converted to a 'long double'.
On 08/31/2011 04:48 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> The test-float test is failing on ppc64 with:
>
> gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC)
> (albeit an aging Fedora 12 system)
>
> due to the failure of this assertion:
>
> ASSERT (LDBL_MIN_EXP <= DBL_MIN_EXP);
>
> It fails b
The test-float test is failing on ppc64 with:
gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) (GCC)
(albeit an aging Fedora 12 system)
due to the failure of this assertion:
ASSERT (LDBL_MIN_EXP <= DBL_MIN_EXP);
It fails because of these numbers:
$ :|gcc -dD -E -include stddef.h -
