-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| [ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
| Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
|
| * Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
|
|>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) w
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
> alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use the BSD getprogname naming
convention.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname module to use
Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
> > alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
>
> Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
Me too.
> How about this proposal?
>
> * Change the progname module to use
Bruno Haible wrote:
Paul Eggert wrote:
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
getprogname(3), if it exists, can be used as well as other
alternatives (e.g. argv[0]).
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the BSD getprogname until now.
Me too.
How about this proposal?
* Change the progname
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:20PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> char *
> get_prog_name(void)
> {
> char * name;
> if (prog_name)
> name = prog_name;
> else
> {
> #if defined(HAVE_GETPROGNAME)
> #include
> name = getprogname();
> #elif defined(
[ This is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/5080
Please remove bug-gnulib from followups. Thank you. ]
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:06:59AM CET:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
>
> > Is it a problem in practice, ie, what are these non-Unix linkers?