[Bug-gnupod] 4th generation iPod Nano

2009-05-26 Thread Richard van den Berg
I temporarily have access to a 4th generation iPod Nano. During the gnupod_INIT I see a bunch of: /usr/bin/tunes2pod: skipping unknown entry of type '32' Should I see where these warnings come from, or is that harmless? One thing I will look into is the artwork. Setting the model to nano_3g m

Re: [Bug-gnupod] SoundCheck/ReplayGain

2009-05-26 Thread chris.com
H. Langos wrote: Hi Chris, On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:06:45PM +0200, chris.com wrote: I first fetch the RG-tag from the FLAC file and transform it to its SoundCheck equivalent Then I transform the file with flac and lame to a music-only mp3 file (no tags). Next I add (with i

Re: [Bug-gnupod] SoundCheck/ReplayGain

2009-05-26 Thread Richard van den Berg
On Tue, May 26, 2009 12:07, H. Langos wrote: > Chris is using the iTunNORM parsing as a workaround. That code has been in > gnupod since 2004. So in theory his approach should work. Ah yes, of course. He is converting the RG info to iTunNORM himself.. which is totally unnecessary with the CVS vers

Re: [Bug-gnupod] SoundCheck/ReplayGain

2009-05-26 Thread H. Langos
Hi Richard, On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:46:08AM +0200, Richard van den Berg wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 23:06, chris.com wrote: > > - gnupod 0.99.7 > > Gnupod only supports ReplayGain in the current CVS version (which I > believe is labeled as 0.99.8). The 0.99.7 version releas

Re: [Bug-gnupod] SoundCheck/ReplayGain

2009-05-26 Thread H. Langos
Hi Chris, On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:06:45PM +0200, chris.com wrote: > > I first fetch the RG-tag from the FLAC file and transform it to its > SoundCheck equivalent > Then I transform the file with flac and lame to a music-only mp3 file > (no tags). > Next I add (with id3v2) an iTunNORM commen