Re: [Bug-gnupod] mktunes.pl creates corrupt iTunesDB ?

2009-06-15 Thread H. Langos
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:57:22PM +0200, Richard van den Berg wrote: > On 13-6-2009 22:36, Richard van den Berg wrote: > > I'm now starting to think it's a RAM issue. According to > > http://ipodlinux.org/wiki/Generations#Fifth_Generation_.285G.29_.2F_Fifth_Generation_Enhanced_.285.5G.29 > > my 30

Re: [Bug-gnupod] mktunes.pl creates corrupt iTunesDB ?

2009-06-15 Thread Richard van den Berg
On 13-6-2009 22:36, Richard van den Berg wrote: > I'm now starting to think it's a RAM issue. According to > http://ipodlinux.org/wiki/Generations#Fifth_Generation_.285G.29_.2F_Fifth_Generation_Enhanced_.285.5G.29 > my 30GB turned 240GB iPod has 32MB of RAM. Maybe I should try to get a > hold of a

Re: [Bug-gnupod] Do not stretch artwork

2009-06-15 Thread Christophe Fergeau
2009/6/15 Richard van den Berg : >>Are you sure that white is always the best way? I think the ipod touch >>is generally black and thus back might be better there? > > Do you want to use the color of the iPod housing? I was going for the > background of the iPod UI. On my iPod Video the artwork is

Re: [Bug-gnupod] Do not stretch artwork

2009-06-15 Thread H. Langos
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 05:12:00PM +0200, Richard van den Berg wrote: > >Are you sure that white is always the best way? I think the ipod touch > >is generally black and thus back might be better there? > > Do you want to use the color of the iPod housing? > I was going for the background of the

Re: [Bug-gnupod] Do not stretch artwork

2009-06-15 Thread Richard van den Berg
>Are you sure that white is always the best way? I think the ipod touch >is generally black and thus back might be better there? Do you want to use the color of the iPod housing? I was going for the background of the iPod UI. On my iPod Video the artwork is never displayed full screen. There is

Re: [Bug-gnupod] Do not stretch artwork

2009-06-15 Thread H. Langos
Hi Richard, Nice patch. I was too lazy to do it myself but I appreciate that patch. I'll commit it as soon as I can. On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:06:02PM +0200, Richard van den Berg wrote: > I might still convert the artwork generation to Image::Magick, but in > the meantime here is a patch to no