Follow-up Comment #8, bug #19804 (project gnustep):
That sounds rather good -- an image is simple, but a typeface might make more
sense, since it's scalable. Using unicode characters like U+2325, U+2318,
U+2387 makes sense
How good is Gnustep's glyph substitution?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?19804>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
