Re: [RFA/make] Extend Framework support

2004-03-11 Thread David Ayers
Nicola Pero wrote: Hello everyone, unless someone objects, I'd like to check this in soon. It adds support to pass -F on platforms/compilers which support it (ie Apple). Is there any advantage in doing so ? The standard Apple framework directories are scanned anyway without the need to pass

Re: [RFA/make] Extend Framework support

2004-03-11 Thread Nicola Pero
> >>Hello everyone, > >> > >>unless someone objects, I'd like to check this in soon. > >> > >>It adds support to pass -F on > >>platforms/compilers which support it (ie Apple). > > > > Is there any advantage in doing so ? The standard Apple framework > > directories are scanned anyway without

[RFA/make] Extend Framework support

2004-03-11 Thread David Ayers
Hello everyone, unless someone objects, I'd like to check this in soon. It adds support to pass -F on platforms/compilers which support it (ie Apple). The actual check I'm using is the OBJC_RUNTIME_LIB but in fact it should be fixed to test the compiler features during configure. OTOH the c

Re: [RFA/make] Extend Framework support

2004-03-11 Thread David Ayers
Nicola Pero wrote: Hello everyone, unless someone objects, I'd like to check this in soon. It adds support to pass -F on platforms/compilers which support it (ie Apple). Is there any advantage in doing so ? The standard Apple framework directories are scanned anyway without the need to pass -

Re: [RFA/make] Extend Framework support

2004-03-11 Thread Nicola Pero
> Hello everyone, > > unless someone objects, I'd like to check this in soon. > > It adds support to pass -F on > platforms/compilers which support it (ie Apple). Is there any advantage in doing so ? The standard Apple framework directories are scanned anyway without the need to pass -F.