[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Status: Ready For Test => Fixed Open/Closed: In Test => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #52518 (project gnustep): I didn't observe any problems on the platforms I have access to. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mess

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Status: In Progress => Ready For Test Open/Closed:Open => In Test ___ Follow-up Comment #7: I tweaked "distclea

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Status:None => In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Category: Base/Foundation => Application ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Category: Application => Base/Foundation ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #52518 (project gnustep): What makes the patch large is the gazillion configure scripts. If you filter them out it should be fairly easy to review. There are also many duplicated configure checks and even macro definitions that the patch cumulates at one place. I can s

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #52518 (project gnustep): I have difficulties reviewing and accepting such a large patch and its testing will require lots of regression on different platforms. I spent hours tweaking the existing system of Enrico for many small issues. A mega-patch might have unexpecte

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #52518 (project gnustep): (1) FND_LIBS (and GUI_LIBS) is recommended by the GNUstep Make manual instead of hardcoding -base/-gui as these variables are defined to the appropriate value on Apple and non-Apple systems. (2) -L flags belong to LIBS and not LDFLAGS. On some

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Assigned to: ivucica => rmottola ___ Follow-up Comment #3: I created a PR at https://github.com/gnustep/apps-gworkspace/pull/2 if you'd like a diff, but I

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Update of bug #52518 (project gnustep): Assigned to:None => ivucica ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #52518 (project gnustep): I am very much in favor of applying this, but I'm insufficiently familiar with GWorkspace to say if there is any reason for why it was done this way. I'll create a PR and send it for review. _

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #52518 (project gnustep): Thinko, I wanted to say "--no-undefined" instead of "--as-needed". ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Me

[bug #52518] [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system

URL: Summary: [GWorkspace] Unnecessarily complex build system Project: GNUstep Submitted by: yavor Submitted on: Sun 26 Nov 2017 09:11:13 PM EET Category: Application S