Hi everybody,
Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroller.
Fist patch changes drawing of knob slot of NSScroller (stiplled
instead of solid). Second one is updates NSBrowser according to NSScroller's changes.
Working on NSScroller, I've noticed that coordinate system of the
gnustep-g
Hi,
Here is the minor changes, cleanups to NSBrowser against the latest CVS
(distance between columns and horizontal scroller was 1 pixel,
should be 2 pixels) and NSScroller patch (same as previuos, just for
case).
sorry for pedantry,
--
Serg Stoyan
NSBrowser.m.patch
Description: Binary da
Serg Stoyan wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroller.
> Fist patch changes drawing of knob slot of NSScroller (stiplled
> instead of solid). Second one is updates NSBrowser according to NSScroller's changes.
>
I didn't apply this patch, mostly because I
Serg Stoyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the minor changes, cleanups to NSBrowser against the latest CVS
> (distance between columns and horizontal scroller was 1 pixel,
I applied this. Thanks.
--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp. | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com
Hi Adam,
> Serg Stoyan wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroller.
> > Fist patch changes drawing of knob slot of NSScroller (stiplled
> > instead of solid). Second one is updates NSBrowser according to
> > NSScroller's changes.
>
> I didn't apply th
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
>> Serg Stoyan wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroller.
>>> Fist patch changes drawing of knob slot of NSScroller (stiplled
>>> instead of solid). Second one is updates NSB
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
>
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> >> Serg Stoyan wrote:
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroller.
> >>> Fist patch changes drawing of knob slot of NSScroller (stiplled
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:48 pm, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Adam,
>>>
Serg Stoyan wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Here is another improvement in appearance: NSScroll
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:48 pm, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
>
> > Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Adam,
[snip]
> I didn't apply this patch, mostly because I kind o
Hi Richard,
> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:48 pm, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
>
> > Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Adam,
> >>>
> Serg Stoyan wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Here is another
Hi Jeff,
> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:48 pm, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> > > Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote:
> > >>> Hi Adam,
>
> [snip]
>
> > I didn't apply this patch, mostly b
> > >> I think we should stick to policy of having a NeXTstep look ... and use
> > >> NSInterfaceStyle where people want alternatives. So a patch to support
> > >> an interface style which gives a stippled scroller background ought
> > >> to be admissable IMO.
> > >
> > > The NeXTstep look _is_
> From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:07:33 +0100 (BST)
>
>
> > > >> I think we should stick to policy of having a NeXTstep look ... and use
> > > >> NSInterfaceStyle where people want alternatives. So a patch to support
> > > >> an interface style which gives a s
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
>>From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:07:33 +0100 (BST)
>>
>>
>>
>>I think we should stick to policy of having a NeXTstep look ... and use
>>NSInterfaceStyle where people want alternatives. So a patch to support
>>an interface st
Quoting Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I booted up my color NeXT and found out it was stippled also. The
> interesting thing is that NeXT does this using the setpattern PostScript
> operator (which basically tells the DPS engine how to draw a color.).
> That's much more complicated than our
> After reading more, I realized the equivalent in OpenStep is to paint
> with a color using:
Thats a good point - I remember having a lot of trouble finding printers that
would actually take NeXT generated output in the early years.
> Sort of. It could be a lot better. It doesn't print to a pr
Benhur Stein wrote:
> Another test: when a window is printed in OPENSTEP, the scroller in
the resulting
> postscript file is not stippled.
OK, now I'm thinking the pattern was just done to make it look good on a
gray-scale monitor and perhaps if NeXT was written using the higher
resolution mo
> OK, now I'm thinking the pattern was just done to make it look good on a
> gray-scale monitor and perhaps if NeXT was written using the higher
> resolution monitors of today it would have been solid.
That a very inetersting observation though - because it implies that the
PostScript being gene
Pete French wrote:
OK, now I'm thinking the pattern was just done to make it look good on a
gray-scale monitor and perhaps if NeXT was written using the higher
resolution monitors of today it would have been solid.
That a very inetersting observation though - because it implies that the
PostSc
19 matches
Mail list logo
