Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
Thanks ... looked OK and seemed to work (not break my existing code) so I applied it, though I don't have any testcases for what it's supposed to do. I've got some that I use for internal testing - but the most obvious is that you should now be able to read any valid UTF-8 sequence into a

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Pete French wrote: BTW- I dont understand some of the GNUstep architecture that well. There are several implementations of rangeOfComposedCharaterSequenecAtIndex - how do I know which is used when ? I note that one of them appears not to use the

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Pete French
The one in NSString.m is used whenever anyone implements their own subclass of NSString. O.K., so I can test that by making an empty subclass of NSString then ? -bat. ___ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 12:34 PM, Pete French wrote: The one in NSString.m is used whenever anyone implements their own subclass of NSString. O.K., so I can test that by making an empty subclass of NSString then ? Unfortunately not quite that simple ... NSString is the semi-abstract

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 01:01 PM, Pete French wrote: All the other methods should already be implemented in NSString.m in terms of those primitives. Are there any existing subclasses of NSString which use these methods Not that I know of. that I could use for testing, or is it best

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Fred Kiefer
Hi Pete, just tired this with your favourit UTF-8 page and I was able to copy it from Mozilla over to Ink. Great now all that Unicode copying should be working. (Not that I ever wanted to copy that page anyway) Cheers Fred Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:41

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Alexander Malmberg
This patch seems to have broken parts of the string handling. When I tried running the test suite today, it not only failed, it dumped core during the string tests. Our test suite isn't complete in any way, but it does cover a lot of things, and a fair amount of important stuff. I'd like to

Re: Scrub last - better patch....

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 02:09 AM, Alexander Malmberg wrote: This patch seems to have broken parts of the string handling. When I tried running the test suite today, it not only failed, it dumped core during the string tests. I re-ran the tests and it was fine ... then I checked and