bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks for testing. However, that failure probably indicates that you are running a binary that uses an older version of libpcre. Compare the results of these commands on a Centos6 system: $ gcc print-pcre-version.c -lpcre; ./a.out 7.8 2008-09-05 $ gcc

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I would think that the tests in grep should account for both pcre and pcre2, at least for a couple of years. Grep currently supports only PCRE. I'd be surprised if it worked with PCRE2. My test was with PCRE 8.35 with Debian and Ubuntu patches (I'm up-to-date with Ubuntu

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Jim Meyering
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>> I would think that the tests in grep should account for both pcre and >>> pcre2, at >>> least for a couple of years. >> >> >> Grep currently supports only PCRE. I'd be

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Zev Weiss
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:27:01AM -0700, Jim Meyering wrote: grep snapshot: http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz 1.3 MB http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz.sig http://meyering.net/grep/grep-2.21.82-fbc5.tar.xz Changes in grep since 2.21.78-7da30: Jim Meyering (4): tests:

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Paul Eggert wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I would think that the tests in grep should account for both pcre and pcre2, at least for a couple of years. Grep currently supports only PCRE. I'd be surprised if it worked with PCRE2. My test was with PCRE 8.35 with Debian and Ubuntu patches (I'm

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks for investigating. I wonder why your libpcre-8.37 needs so much stack and mine (built from the release tarball by me, with no patch) segfaults only when I restrict stack to less than about 50 KB. I.e.,this exits with status 1: ( ulimit -s 50; LC_ALL=C src/grep -P

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jim Meyering wrote: grep snapshot: http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz 1.3 MB http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz.sig http://meyering.net/grep/grep-2.21.82-fbc5.tar.xz I tested in a linuxfromscratch environment. See

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Paul Eggert wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I tested in a linuxfromscratch environment. See http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter03/packages.html for a list of all packages. You're getting one unexpected failure, from pcre-jitstack. That package list doesn't mention which

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Jim Meyering
grep snapshot: http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz 1.3 MB http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz.sig http://meyering.net/grep/grep-2.21.82-fbc5.tar.xz Changes in grep since 2.21.78-7da30: Jim Meyering (4): tests: avoid spurious failure on OpenBSD 5.8 maint: NEWS:

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I tested in a linuxfromscratch environment. See http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter03/packages.html for a list of all packages. You're getting one unexpected failure, from pcre-jitstack. That package list doesn't mention which version of libpcre the

bug#21755: new snapshot available: grep-2.21.82-fbc5

2015-10-25 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Jim, On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:27:01 -0700 Jim Meyering wrote: > grep snapshot: > http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz 1.3 MB > http://meyering.net/grep/grep-ss.tar.xz.sig > http://meyering.net/grep/grep-2.21.82-fbc5.tar.xz > > Changes in grep since