Follow-up Comment #13, bug #60655 (project groff): [comment #12 comment #12:] > I don't see much fragility in what you are using now,
True, there's not much, but pretty clearly more than solving the problem at its source and avoiding the need for the workarounds altogether. The more moving parts there are, the more potential points of failure. > Perhaps a general user who has a similar requirement, if they > ask the best way to do it, we could point them to diffing > the -Z output to avoid problems with diffing postscript output. Certainly, that may work well for them. Would an additional grops option or two that such users never use be an obstacle to your suggested workflow? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60655> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/