second time with complete list of addressees ...
hi branden,
thank you for this background info. really appreciated. I was aware of part of
it
but definitely not all of it.
out of curiosity: if I get this right, presence and usage of the t-command
thus excludes any application of microtypograp
hi deri,
thank you, although I am starting to feel obtuse :).
so what you say is *only* grops does not find SS (in my previous broken setup with disjunct
`download' instances in system and my additional fonts tree) but groff still finds
the system SS font description file? and then groff bases
On Tuesday, 9 August 2022 13:46:43 BST joerg van den hoff wrote:
> hi deri,
>
> thank you, although I am starting to feel obtuse :).
>
> so what you say is *only* grops does not find SS (in my previous broken
> setup with disjunct `download' instances in system and my additional fonts
> tree) but
not my day... again forgot to include the list in the address field. so second
try again:
On 09.08.22 17:05, Deri wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 August 2022 13:46:43 BST joerg van den hoff wrote:
hi deri,
thank you, although I am starting to feel obtuse :).
so what you say is *only* grops does not fin
On 09.08.22 20:03, Deri wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 August 2022 18:13:10 BST joerg van den hoff wrote:
question: is there a deeper reason, why grops does not traverse all known
font locations/dirs and scan all found `download' files until, hopefully, a
hit is found? I mean except "someone would need
[looping in groff@ again due to a shift in discussion focus to
development]
At 2022-08-09T19:14:25+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> On 09.08.22 17:05, Deri wrote:
> > groff and grops can find the SS file, which gives the widths of the
> > SS glyphs, but grops cannot find the Symbolsl.pfa file bec
On Tuesday, 9 August 2022 20:38:44 BST G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [looping in groff@ again due to a shift in discussion focus to
> development]
>
> At 2022-08-09T19:14:25+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> It is possible for device or font description files to be incomplete; if
> they are missing
