Follow-up Comment #4, bug #64624 (project groff):
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> Using "naked" diff does not provide the surroundings to pinpoint the
> place where the difference occurs.
A bare diff does lack context but shows line numbers. But in the comment #2
case, the location of the one line
Update of bug #64639 (project groff):
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
___
Follow-up Comment #6:
Works for me! Thanks as always for your swift attention to the report.
Updating status.
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #64639 (project groff):
[comment #4 comment #4:]
> Nevertheless Bjarni seems to have found a footgun. (Perhaps he has a big
gun...or big feet.)
>
> Could we use more input validation in `DRH`?
Not necessary, really. I preferred to use mom's COLOR macro in the
