[bug #64772] [hdtbl] consider deprecating

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64772 (project groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > Are you generating Heidelberger tables for your own work, or merely > running basic tests against the package because it's part of groff? Clarification: the "merely" isn't meant to dismiss the value of such testing, but

[bug #64772] [hdtbl] consider deprecating

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64772 (project groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > I see no need to abandon "hdtbl". The proposal to deprecate it means it should exist in the next n releases of groff with notice that it's deprecated. It's unclear how much use it gets, as every reported bug against i

[bug #64772] [hdtbl] consider deprecating

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64772 (project groff): I see no need to abandon "hdtbl". The code produces the examples without an error, that I can see. "groff -ww" reported some warnings, which I have provided patches for (one has to be corrected). I have also adjusted some values of variables

[bug #64779] [PATCH] [refer.tmac] per-style changes to reference formatting are ignored for certain fields

Update of bug #64779 (project groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0

[bug #64779] [PATCH] [refer.tmac] per-style changes to reference formatting are ignored for certain fields

Update of bug #64779 (project groff): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => gbranden ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #64779] [PATCH] [refer.tmac] per-style changes to reference formatting are ignored for certain fields

URL: Summary: [PATCH] [refer.tmac] per-style changes to reference formatting are ignored for certain fields Group: GNU roff Submitter: None Submitted: Mon 16 Oct 2023 08:03:09 AM UTC