[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2022-02-01 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #61022 (project groff): Planned Release: 1.23.0 => None ___ Follow-up Comment #8: In the meantime, FP needs a new name--AT already seized it in the early 1980s. 8th edition ms(7)

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-10-01 Thread Keith Marshall
Update of bug #61022 (project groff): Planned Release:None => 1.23.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Hi Branden, As discussed on [bug #61157 ticket #61157], I've pushed the two attached patches,

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-09-20 Thread Keith Marshall
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #61022 (project groff): As an adjunct to my tentative proposal for FS-MARK documentation, previously attached, I've further produced a tentative update to the groff_ms(7) manpage, to document FP; this is now also attached. (file #51947)

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-09-20 Thread Keith Marshall
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #61022 (project groff): Hi Branden, On [bug #61157 ticket #61157], you added an incidental comment: > ... I intended to document FS-MARK but found myself confused with respect to use cases. I'll follow up with you about that elsewhere since it's off-topic for this

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-08-13 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #61022 (project groff): Thanks, Keith. You've presented a solid use case for .FP, I think. The other thing that bugs me about footnote paragraphing is how elaborate the semantics of FF 0 are. The paragraph is indented _unless_ there's nothing to indent it with. This

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-08-12 Thread Keith Marshall
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #61022 (project groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > To achieve a viable mechanism for implementing the forward footnote links, I think we need to a) redefine "\**" as "\c", and b) provide a hook within "FS", (which then *cannot* be separated from the mark location), to

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-08-11 Thread Keith Marshall
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #61022 (project groff): [comment #1 comment #1:] > It certainly does seem like it was intended for a hook. The implementation dates back to the dawn of repo time. > > > ^351da0dc macros/tmac.s (James Clark 1991-06-02 04:20:34 -0500 1582) .de FP > ^351da0dc

[bug #61022] [ms] documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-08-11 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Update of bug #61022 (project groff): Status:None => Need Info Assigned to:None => gbranden Summary: [ms]: Documention neglects to mention FP macro => [ms] documention neglects to

[bug #61022] [ms]: Documention neglects to mention FP macro

2021-08-07 Thread Keith Marshall
URL: Summary: [ms]: Documention neglects to mention FP macro Project: GNU troff Submitted by: keithmarshall Submitted on: Sat 07 Aug 2021 09:31:22 PM UTC Category: Macro - ms