[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #13, bug#62830 (group groff): [https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-groff/2023-12/msg00090.html Oliver posted the following to the bug-groff list]; apparently the GNU Savannah web site was not permitting him to comment on this ticket, which is pretty weird. Hi, thank you

Re: [bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Dear All, I just tried to reply following the Savannah link below, but was apparently not successful. I'll keep trying! Before my answer gets lost at /dev/nul, here it is: Hi, thank you very much for considering my previous comment on the CJK font naming issue. It is perfectly fine with me

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #12, bug#62830 (group groff): Just a note to point out that gropdf (in the deri-gropdf-ng git branch) already handles CJK documents. The attached pdf is an example, you should see CJK in the pdf bookmarks as well. (file #55489)

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #11, bug#62830 (group groff): [comment #9 comment #9:] > It would be helpful to me if Messrs. Tanaka and Corff could > reach a consensus on a schema for naming CJK font families. :) To assist in that, I'm adding Oliver to this bug's cc. Oliver, do you have any response to

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #10, bug#62830 (group groff): I updated my patch to adjust to the latest upstream source code. > While Mincho and Gothic loosely compare to serif and sans serif styles > I think the font family classification terminology should be language-agnostic Thank Oliver for kind

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Update of bug #62830 (project groff): Status: Postponed => Need Info ___ Follow-up Comment #9: Quoting Oliver Corff from the mailing list post cited in comment #7: I had a look at

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #62830 (project groff): Oliver Corff posted a lengthy commentary about CJK fonts: http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2023-05/msg8.html ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #62830 (project groff): I updated my patch. 1. Font description files There is a precedent of font description file for Japanese support of groff by Japanese developers (Fumitoshi UKAI et al.) https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/1.18.1.1-12 They

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Update of bug #62830 (project groff): Status:None => Postponed Assigned to:None => gbranden Planned Release:None => 1.24.0

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #62830 (project groff): Thank you for the update. I don't think I am going to have time to properly consider this patch in the depth it requires before the groff 1.23.0 release, which I am hoping to get at least a release candidate out for before the end of the calendar

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #62830 (project groff): I updated my patch. - sync with master of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git I hope the maintainers to consider accepting my request. Thanks, Takuji TANAKA (file #53990) ___

[bug #62830] [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16

Update of bug #62830 (project groff): Summary: [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16 => [PATCH] [grops] support CJK fonts encoded in UTF16 ___ Reply to this item at: