URL:
  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65512>

                 Summary: [afmtodit] recognize groff's ligatures when encoded
with underscores in a font file
                   Group: GNU roff
               Submitter: barx
               Submitted: Sun 24 Mar 2024 07:32:58 PM CDT
                Category: Utilities
                Severity: 1 - Wish
              Item Group: Feature change
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None


    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 24 Mar 2024 07:32:58 PM CDT By: Dave <barx>
Ten years ago, Tadziu pointed out
(http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2013-11/msg00016.html) that "afmtodit assumes
[the five ligatures groff knows] will be called 'fi', 'fl', 'ff', 'ffi', and
'ffl', but in the new fonts they are called 'f_i', 'f_l', 'f_f', 'f_f_i', and
'f_f_l'."  afmtodit should recognize these alternate ligature names.

In a followup post (https://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2013-11/msg00025.html),
Werner deems expanding afmtodit's default_ligatures hash in this manner a
"worse alternative" to doing the ligature redesign called for in bug #64344. 
But it also seems a much simpler one, so unless someone is ready to jump on
#64344, this afmtodit tweak could be a useful stopgap.







    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65512>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/


Reply via email to