From: Erich Boleyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GRUB executables
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 14:21:15 -0700
> Personally, I like the idea of having all config files editable at
> boot time as desired.
Yeah. I think that is preferable, too. The flexibility is one of the
features of GRUB.
> I w
OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of them would be generated by a modified isapnp from isapnp.conf
> > I don't want to embed a bison parser into GRUB. It is much easier to
> > generate i386 code that just writes to the ports.
>
> I agree.
The disadvantage to this, if I'm und
I've written almost all the new manual. I think it is already better
than the old one, but I'd like to hear how you feel before replacing
it. Please tell me what is missing and what words are awkward if any.
--
OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: GRUB executables
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 19:53:10 +0400 (EEST)
> One of them would be generated by a modified isapnp from isapnp.conf
> I don't want to embed a bison parser into GRUB. It is much easier to
> generate i386 code that just writes to the
Hello, OKUJI!
> But please don't modify the netboot code any more, because I'm
> planning to replace it with a ``netboot external module''. Currently
> HISAZUMI Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on it to implement it
> with the Linux network drivers.
That's very interesting.
I was planning
Hello, Sidney!
> > IMHO it is a bad practice to restict use of examples, expecially when they
> > are examples for a standard.
>
> Look at OpenBLT (www.openblt.org). I just recently modified our bootstrap
> mechanism to support booting from GRUB and like all of OpenBLT, the code
> is under the
From: Michael Hohmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: A few patches
Date: 22 Oct 1999 03:59:43 +0200
> I decided to upgrade our local version of GRUB (the one the netboot
> support originates from) to GNU GRUB, and I found I needed some
> modifications (more on that below).
Thanks. I'll apply you
