I've fixed some bugs in the code. Now GRUB can boot bzImage
successfully (at least for 2.2.x) but cannot boot zImage.
Okuji
From: Adrian Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems booting with LS-120 drive
Date: 25 Jul 2000 06:54:13 +0200
Thanks to Jochen and Okuji for the help and the solution. One comment,
as this is a "seldom used" feature, wouldn't it be better to create a
seperate stage1 to leave the
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply.
I invented one dirty trick which will allow me to do so. The idea is to
map logical disks from extended partion to one entry in primary partition.
It should make some partitioning programs unhappy because of
25-Jul-00 21:10 you wrote:
I've fixed some bugs in the code. Now GRUB can boot bzImage
successfully (at least for 2.2.x) but cannot boot zImage.
It's VERY hard to fit usable 2.2.x kernel in zImage and impossible for 2.4.x
(talks about bloat :-(( ) so I think it's Ok. zImage exist at all
From: "Khimenko Victor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux support code is rewrited
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:46:38 +0400 (MSD)
It's VERY hard to fit usable 2.2.x kernel in zImage and impossible for 2.4.x
(talks about bloat :-(( ) so I think it's Ok.
That's not acceptable, since I don't
From: Stefan Ondrejicka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New commands to allow booting obscure OS's from logical disks in extended
partiton
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:49:54 +0200 (MET DST)
I don't said it is bad idea, but have also its pros/cons as have my
solution. With my solution is good,
On Jul 22, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
From: "Alecsandru Soare" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reading problems with FAT16
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:36:18 +0300
I use grub ver. 0.5.94 and I encounter problems when I try to use initrd
command to load an Linux root image from a FAT16 partition.
Dave Siracusa writes:
DS Question: Your web page mentions you support NT (chaining mode),
DS can you elaborate?
From the GRUB Manual (grub)Configuration:
# For booting Windows NT or Windows95
title Windows NT / Windows 95 boot menu
root(hd0,0)
makeactive
From: Stefan Ondrejicka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New commands to allow booting obscure OS's from logical disks in extended
partiton
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:00:02 +0200 (MET DST)
It is. But why not let users to break the rules, when they accept that
it should be dangerous for them.
25-Jul-00 11:47 you wrote:
First: Sorry I sent to this email.
Question: Your web page mentions you support NT (chaining mode), can you
elaborate?
What's exactly your problem ? I have both NT and W2K chain-loaded from
GRUB without problems, for example.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
No, the attempt to boot from a CD-ROM failed because there was no
CD in the drive; stage1 and stage2 were on a floppy. Is that what
you meant?
Jonathan
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM : Failure ...
stage1 stage2 04 -
25-Jul-00 10:21 you wrote:
Dave Siracusa writes:
DS Question: Your web page mentions you support NT (chaining mode),
DS can you elaborate?
From the GRUB Manual (grub)Configuration:
# For booting Windows NT or Windows95
title Windows NT / Windows 95 boot menu
root
From: Daniel Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netboot: ne2000 pci card hanging
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:40:00 +0200
I tried to use the netboot facility, but with my ne2000 pci card, it wouldn't
start right out of the box, so I checked the etherboot homepage and found a
workaround
From: Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Read Error with Asus P2B-L motherboard
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
No, the attempt to boot from a CD-ROM failed because there was no
CD in the drive; stage1 and stage2 were on a floppy. Is that what
you meant?
Oh, yes.
It's not a fatal bug but very annoying.
The menu.lst file cannot be processed as usual for every user who has a
boot partition mounted as /boot under linux because of the hard coded path
for menu.lst in asmtub.c on line 89 in grub 0.5.95.
Because of this I had to make another directory and
15 matches
Mail list logo
