I was too stupid. Now the current CVS version should work.
Thierry, you were a bit too late to notice that. I noticed that a few
minutes earlier than you. ;)
Okuji
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gr
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:38:57AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Other patch for commands section in grub-new.texi
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:42:53 +0100
>
> > +The other ones are simply all the commands that one can use in the
> > +command-l
FWIW, I have looked to the code, and I'm a bit suspicious about the
following. The value of the second sector of stage2 is kept, by
stage1_5.c, finally via disk_read_func, and passed via chain_stage2 which
is defined in "asm.S". This value is moved in %ebp :
/* set up to pass the second sector of
From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Other patch for commands section in grub-new.texi
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:42:53 +0100
> +The other ones are simply all the commands that one can use in the
> +command-line. If you think about the configuration file as a ``script'',
> +all the co
I'm not satisfied with the new manual yet, but I've updated the CVS
repository so now the new manual is the current. I've also written a
new programmer guide, which is far from complete. A while ago, I said
that I would separate the programmer guide from the user manual, but I
decided that that wa
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:24:42PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> > blocklist (hd0,0)/dev/stage2 output:
> > (hd0,0)<3468960,0,512><3468...>...,3469072+72
>
> It seems that Stage 1.5 passes an invalid sector number to Stage 2. To
> make sure that my guess is correct, can you show the full output
Here is another patch for the commands description, where all is done is
an addition of explanations.
--
Thierry LARONDE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10, rue du Bel Air, 74000 ANNECY - FRANCE/ Tel : 33.(0)4.50.67.46.61
/home du SDF (Site Debian Francophone) : http://sdf.polynum.org/
--- docs/grub-new.t
From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Patch for new user-ref manual
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:17:36 +0100
> The problem that I have is that, if I understand why the menu-specific are
> menu-specific (they command the menu interface), I don't really understand
> the limitation for
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:12:01PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Patch for new user-ref manual
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:19:05 +0100
>
> > Modifications : there were three groups of commands, remain two :
> > menu-specific (the ones used to
From: Torvald Riegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: savedefault is still not working
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:09:34 +0100
> blocklist (hd0,0)/dev/stage2 output:
> (hd0,0)<3468960,0,512><3468...>...,3469072+72
It seems that Stage 1.5 passes an invalid sector number to Stage 2. To
make sure that
From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Patch for new user-ref manual
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:19:05 +0100
> Modifications : there were three groups of commands, remain two :
> menu-specific (the ones used to describe how GRUB must handle the menu
> interface), and general commands. So
Torvald, please use bug-grub.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:14:46AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
>
> One thing that you can do easily is to log what savedefault_func
> does. To do this, turn on the debug mode by the command "debug" and
> then run "savedefault". Note that you need to run "debug"
12 matches
Mail list logo
