Re: Fw: GRUB: Hercules console and vbeset command

2001-02-27 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
I'm sorry that I couldn't have enough time as soon as I got your patch, but I finally added hercules support into the CVS version. Because I didn't think the code should be written in assembly, I translated it to C with inline assembly. In addition, I separated the hercules console type from the

--disable-auto-linux-mem-opt (Was: Re: ack! grub bug...)

2001-02-27 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
With the CVS version, you can now specify `--disable-auto-linux-mem-opt' to the configure script. Okuji ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: [PATCH] Displaying boot file name after calling bootp

2001-02-27 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] Displaying boot file name after calling bootp Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 22:32:24 +0100 The information about the name of the boot file is, for me, needed, Why? Okuji ___ Bug-grub mailing list

Re: [patch] grub-install for FreeBSD

2001-02-27 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: HASEGAWA Tomoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [patch] grub-install for FreeBSD Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:49:53 +0900 (JST) I hack grub-install utility for FreeBSD(-4.2). I test only installation to /dev/ad0 on my FreeBSD-4.2-STABLE machine, but even da or so will work. Many thanks for

Re: [PATCH] default_entry and fallback

2001-02-27 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] default_entry and fallback Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:33:07 +0100 By default, if the default is wrong, it is reset to 0. Some users were a bit puzzled about that, expecting the default to be set to fallback. That's a good idea. Thanks.

Re: [PATCH] default_entry and fallback

2001-02-27 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:41:35AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: From: Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] default_entry and fallback Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:33:07 +0100 By default, if the default is wrong, it is reset to 0. Some users were a bit puzzled about that,

Re: Patch for EtherExpressPro100

2001-02-27 Thread HORIKAWA Kazunori
Thanks for your contribution. But, since the device drivers are derived from Etherboot, I don't want to modify the code directly, if possible. So, could you contact Etherboot developers, so Etherboot works with your card? Once Etherboot is fixed, we can port the code to GRUB in a normal way.

Re: [PATCH] Displaying boot file name after calling bootp

2001-02-27 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:32:27AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: From: Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] Displaying boot file name after calling bootp Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 22:32:24 +0100 The information about the name of the boot file is, for me, needed, Why? DHCP

Re: grub_0.5.96.1-0.1_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-02-27 Thread Gordon Matzigkeit
Gregg C Levine writes: GCL I can see why, after that one, why it is necessary for the GCL Debian project to post these reminders. But so far I haven't GCL seen anything related from Mandrake. It's because I was acting both as GRUB maintainer and the Debian GRUB packager, so I requested that

BSDSearch.Com - !New! Search Engine for BSD Users

2001-02-27 Thread bsdjesus
BSDSearch.com http://www.bsdsearch.com is a new search engine for BSD Users around the Glove. It aims to be the largest indexed directory on the 'net for BSD Users. BSDSearch is by far the easiest way to find resources for iBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Anything Related to BSD. For more

Distributions using GRUB (was: RE: grub_0.5.96.1-0.1_i386.change

2001-02-27 Thread Treutwein; Bernhard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug-grub digest, Vol 1 #181 - 6 msgs Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:03:07 -0500 many distributions are using GRUB, as its bootloader, as opposed to I'm shure that the

Re: [netboot] A multiboot compliant GRUB ?

2001-02-27 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Christoph Plattner wrote: Hello, Hello, I don't understand the the sense of that. Why I want to boot GRUB via GRUB ? If I have running a GRUB than I can do anything. The only missing point you may speak about, is the possibility to load GRUB