From: HORIKAWA Kazunori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch for EtherExpressPro100
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:11:08 +0900
I checked ehterboot.
Current version of etherboot has already fixed it.
So, patch is not needed.
Ok, then I'll update only the eepro100 driver, as I have too little
time
From: Christoph Plattner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch for EtherExpressPro100
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:35:08 +0100
This leads me to the question, how we will treat the GRUB 'netboot' tree
in sync with etherboot. One idea was to have real a separate tree for
the
driver files, so that
On Feb 26, dup wrote:
Hi,
i have already install grub on my machine, but after i reinstall all
the system (Linux, Windows), i can't install grub.
I ve made it many times but now it don't want with error 27 (i
think) where it says that it can't write to the disk. Please why it
does this
Hey, lu
Sorry, it took longer than i expected but I found the site, it's
http://www.multiopen.com
Get to the site and mail me later
bye~
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
More a lack of understanding on my part. I found
grub yestarday, and think it will solve a problem
I have. I need to boot a dos floppy image using
pxe. I have pxegrub running, and can get to a
command prompt. I tried a testload and everything
seems ok. My root is set to (nd). But I havent
Hello,
I'm trying to use GRUB and I ran into a situation that I don't know
whether it's a problem or this is the way it's supposed to work.
I have a HD with the following partitioning:
/dev/hda1 /boot
/dev/hda2 /
/dev/hda3 /develop
/dev/hda4 swap
When I try to use the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:30:59AM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use GRUB and I ran into a situation that I don't know
whether it's a problem or this is the way it's supposed to work.
I have a HD with the following partitioning:
/dev/hda1 /boot
/dev/hda2 /
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:25:04AM -0600, D. R. Holsbeck wrote:
More a lack of understanding on my part. I found
grub yestarday, and think it will solve a problem
I have. I need to boot a dos floppy image using
pxe. I have pxegrub running, and can get to a
command prompt. I tried a
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 05:06:54PM +0100, Gerben Dierick wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
When booting, Grub displays its menu and starts counting down the timeout.
This is where the problem is. For each new value of the seconds (%d in the
/boot/grub/messages file), a new line saying "default os is
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Vincent GUYOT wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I send you all this email, hoping an answer before formatting my hard drive :(
To GRUB specialists (developpers so): if you never heard about this, tell
me. May be isn't it because GRUB.
[..]
the problem:
I
Hi folks,
thank you for programming that wonderful bootloader grub!
But there's a small bug. The EEPRO100 driver doesn't work for the intel
82559ER. The standard kernel driver doesn't work too, but the driver intel
provided worked, and the source is available too. Maybe you can have a look at it
Dans son message du mercredi 28 fvrier 2001, Ivan Passos crivait:
My guess is that this is happening because the /boot directory is mounted
in a partition different from the root partition.
You're right.
- If the latter is the case, what can I do to fix the problem (removing
/dev/hda1
Ok, I did the patch already using the old TIMEOUT method (used before in
etherboot and GRUB) but the new routines handling the EEPROM access,
etc.
At the moment my time is limited to do that in a "releasable" way, but I
will try in the next few days.
Cheers
Christoph Plattner
OKUJI
The problem is the the PCI chip ID. The i82559ER has 0x1209 instead of
0x1229
(used for i82557..559). The vendor ID is 0x8086 in all cases ( = intel )
!
I have done a local patch in GRUB to handle
(1) the i82559er also
(2) use the new EEPROM access routines to avoid the error
Hello GRUB people,
now I have done the patch for the eepro100 stuff.
Two points changed:
(1) Added support for i82559ER (not tested here @home, as I have
no 559ER card, but I tested the modified chip ID in the company
on a real 559ER
(2) Changed access to EEPROM
15 matches
Mail list logo
