Re: what is the status of the reiserfs support?

2001-05-29 Thread Jochen Hoenicke
On May 28, Michal Maru¹ka wrote: * (about a month ago) I spent days installing grub on a reiserFS 3.6.25 disks. Without success. Since then I have booted my computers from a (common and last) floppy. * My computers with reiserFS 3.5.x do work well with Grub. * Since then i've

Bug#35849: marked as done (grub: should have easy way to modify kernel command line)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#35849: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#98785: marked as done (grub: cant install)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#80241: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#92269: marked as done ('update-grub' having difficulty with /boot partition(using devfs, no devfsd))

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#92269: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#72311: marked as done (arch-specific files in /usr/share)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#72311: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#75333: marked as done (grub-install: -e: command not found)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#75333: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#76090: marked as done (grub-install doesn't run)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#75333: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#79515: marked as done (grub-install fails with floppy)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#75333: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#80276: marked as done (grub: grub-install is broken)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#80276: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#80394: marked as done (Build-depends missing and fail to compile because texi2html invalid option I)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#80394: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#80422: marked as done (can't compile: texi2html option parsing changed)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#80422: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#95594: marked as done (grub: Symlinks to kernels (such as the default /vmlinuz symlink) are broken in grub for reiserfs built with a 2.4 kernel (3.6 version reiserfs), fix exists in CVS grub however.)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 14:56:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#95594: fixed in grub 0.5.96.1.cvs20010528-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Re: [Bug-grub] Re: Debian Maintainer

2001-05-29 Thread Gordon Matzigkeit
Jason Thomas writes: JT alright then if you want to remove all the stuff in the debian JT directory in cvs and fix the Makefiles and configure JT scripts. that would be excellent. Okay, this is done now. -- Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED] //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/) Committed to

device ordering

2001-05-29 Thread Jason Thomas
hey anyone have any ideas what to put in the doco to answer this question. The grub info file says: | (hd0,1) | |Here, `hd' means it is a hard disk drive. The first integer `0' | indicates the drive number, that is, the first hard disk, while the | second integer, `1',

ATA66 does not boot.

2001-05-29 Thread Gregory Gee
I decided to look at grub and made a grub boot floppy. But I can't get it to boot to my linux hde drive. I have no problem using lilo. hde is the only drive in my PC right now. What do I have to do to get grub to boot from a drive on the HPT366 IDE drives? [gregg@mothergoose grub]$ df