Folks,
Please, can you add some information to the FAQ? I'm constantly asked
why the Grub manpage is so pathetic and useless, and why people must be
forced to use an info reader - considered non-intuitive and non-standard
- to read Grub documentation. Please, can you make this FAQ #15?
I
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Testing for some things, including 4GB machines (I have one
now).
I think GRUB should work. IIRC, there were some successful reports on
large memory machines several months ago.
Yeah. I reviewed some of the code this weekend for
At Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:09:12 -0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh well, that and maybe other Multiboot info bits being passed as
text/human-readable is food for thought. I've been getting more
opinionated about such things as I go further into working on my own
OS project. I'm kind of
Title: eNewsletter 2
YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS EMAIL BECAUSE YOU HAVE EXPRESSED INTEREST IN PRODUCTS THAT WE CAN SAVE YOU MONEY ON. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE REMOVED FROM OUR MAILING LIST PLEASE CLICK THE UNSUBSCRIBE LINK AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS EMAIL. WE CAN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU WILL BE
Because GRUB has too many commands (IMHO), I decided that the command
help shouldn't show all the available commands, when no argument is
specified. This is a relevant item in NEWS:
* The command help doesn't show all the available commands any longer,
when no argument is specified. Rarely
Yoshinori K. Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because GRUB has too many commands (IMHO), I decided that the command
help shouldn't show all the available commands, when no argument is
specified.
I think it would be a good idea to let the user know this as part of
the help output. Something
Title: eNewsletter 2
YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS EMAIL BECAUSE YOU HAVE EXPRESSED INTEREST IN PRODUCTS THAT WE CAN SAVE YOU MONEY ON. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE REMOVED FROM OUR MAILING LIST PLEASE CLICK THE UNSUBSCRIBE LINK AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS EMAIL. WE CAN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU WILL BE
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:52:02PM +0900, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
At Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:02:30 +0200,
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
Besides hoping for a solution, I have a question: Is it possible to
add a pseudo-driver that will use the PXE? How difficult would it be
for me to do, assuming
