New machine, old drive cannot boot

2003-03-19 Thread Bill Olson
I built a dual-boot machine (w2k and rh 8.0) on a machine with a cdrom and had no problems booting to either os. I needed to move the drive to a machine without a cdrom, now I can boot to the rh os, but not the w2k. Any ideas on how I can repair? I have checked the list for similar problems

Re: Your message to Bug-grub awaits moderator approval

2003-03-19 Thread victor sperber
I have sent the query below twice and each time I get a reply from bug-grub-bounces. Why? I am using grub 0.90 which came with red hat linux and uses linux kernel 2.4.7-10. It has done everything I need so far loading Linux and Windows from 2 disks. However using PowerQuest

RE: Your message to Bug-grub awaits moderator approval

2003-03-19 Thread Brett Russ
However using PowerQuest Partition Manager I created 2 extended partitions on the second disk, Fat16 and Fat32, and copied partitions into them with Norton Ghost. I can see these partitions under Windows and Linux fdisk but I can't get Grub to see them so that I can boot them. I address them

RE: New machine, old drive cannot boot

2003-03-19 Thread Brett Russ
I needed to move the drive to a machine without a cdrom, now I can boot to the rh os, but not the w2k. Any ideas on how I can repair? Perhaps the drive ordering is different now and you are using the same device.map as the old machine? I assume GRUB is installed in your MBR. Can you send the

kernel panic

2003-03-19 Thread mi
And that's the reason i wanted a full functional bootfloppy first ;-) Stages and menu so far work well. Great the commandline. Now I've got my linux /boot on the second hd (ide1 primary) and tried two titles: kernel on (hd0,1) and kernel on (fd0). Grub also starts the kernel successfully.

Re: [Bug-grub] Re: e1000 patch for grub 0.93

2003-03-19 Thread Jason Thomas
can this be done in a way that makes the next update a 'just drop the new drive in' way. what I mean is something automated, or that just uses the code as is. making updates much easier. Just a thought. On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Randy Couey wrote: I am currently negotiating

Re: e1000 patch for grub 0.93

2003-03-19 Thread Brian Sammon
Whether or not an update occurs, I would suggest that patches have a place on the grub ftp site, as the official releases will always fall behind the newest hardware. An unsupported patches directory, with a use-at-your-own-risk policy, would be a useful source for adminstrators