where grub files go?

2003-09-04 Thread Wu, Qishi
Dear sir/madam, I installed a new linux kernel 2.4.21 for my redhat 9.0 (with a kernel 2.4.20) and patched web100 to it. Everything went just normally when I compiled and installed the new kernel. However, after I patched the web100 and recompiled the 2.4.21-web100 kernel, I found that

$B:_Bp%9%?%C%UJg=8!tL$5Bz(B$B9-9p(B

2003-09-04 Thread BravoFineBoy
$B$*K;$7$$=j?=$7Lu$"$j$^$;$s!#(B $BITI,MWl9g$O:o=|4j$$$^$9!#(B (B $B!y!!:_Bp%9%?%C%UJg=8!!!y(B $B$"$J$?$K$b$G$-$kA4$/?7$7$$%7%9%F%`$,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B

AntiVirus Alert!

2003-09-04 Thread AntiVirus Xnet
Fisierul (part0002:document_9446.pif) atasat email-ului trimis de catre [EMAIL PROTECTED] pentru [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cu subiectul: Re: Thank you!) este infectat cu virusul: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The file (part0002:document_9446.pif) attached to mail (with subject: Re: Thank you!) sent by

Symantec AVF detected that you sent a message with a prohibited attachment name

2003-09-04 Thread administrator
Subject of the message: Re: Details Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney Prohibited attachment: your_document.pif ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL

2003-09-04 Thread virus-scanner
V I R U S A L E R T Our viruschecker found the 'W32/Sobig-F' virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s): - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator to do so. For your reference, here are the

2003-09-04 Thread
-: 8-9 2003 : , ., , ,- . , , . - , - , ,. , ,: (095) 258-51-84 : 1.. . . . 2. - .

Symantec AVF detected that you sent a message with a prohibited attachment name

2003-09-04 Thread administrator
Subject of the message: Re: Your application Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney Prohibited attachment: your_details.pif ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: a couple of questions about GRUB

2003-09-04 Thread Brian Sammon
2.- Is there any kind of fingerprint to certainly know that grub (and not another bootloader)is installed in a MBR? Hmmm... doing something like dd if=/dev/hda bs=something count=something |grep -i grub might be useful... ___ Bug-grub mailing

Re: grub-0.93-win32-iso9660.diff

2003-09-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:18:25PM +0100, Yoshinori Okuji wrote: --- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm interested in your grub-0.93-win32-iso9660.diff patch and would like to get it integrated in GRUB CVS. That is not your task: One who decides if a feature should be added is

Re: grub-0.93-win32-iso9660.diff

2003-09-04 Thread Robert Millan
I haven't looked at the TODO, but it gives me the impression that there are too many people interested in having new features in GRUB to be in feature freeze. I believe this is detrimental for GRUB wide usage. For example, support for new filesystems and, to some extent, for non-multiboot

Symantec AVF detected that you sent a message with a prohibited attachment name

2003-09-04 Thread administrator
Subject of the message: Re: Approved Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney Prohibited attachment: document_all.pif ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Re: grub-0.93-win32-iso9660.diff

2003-09-04 Thread Yoshinori Okuji
--- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a generic answer for these questions when applied to adding a new filesystem? Adding a new filesystem must be conservative as well. Normally, I don't object to adding a new filesystem, but we must test it thouroughly before adding it. The