Dear sir/madam,
I installed a new linux kernel 2.4.21 for my redhat 9.0 (with
a kernel 2.4.20) and patched web100 to it. Everything went just normally when I
compiled and installed the new kernel. However, after I patched the web100 and
recompiled the 2.4.21-web100 kernel, I found that
$B$*K;$7$$=j?=$7Lu$"$j$^$;$s!#(B
$BITI,MWl9g$O:o=|4j$$$^$9!#(B
(B
$B!y!!:_Bp%9%?%C%UJg=8!!!y(B
$B$"$J$?$K$b$G$-$kA4$/?7$7$$%7%9%F%`$,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
Fisierul (part0002:document_9446.pif) atasat email-ului trimis de catre [EMAIL
PROTECTED] pentru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (cu subiectul: Re: Thank you!) este infectat cu virusul:
Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The file (part0002:document_9446.pif) attached to mail (with subject: Re: Thank you!)
sent by
Subject of the message: Re: Details
Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney
Prohibited attachment: your_document.pif
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
'W32/Sobig-F'
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are the
-:
8-9 2003
:
,
.,
,
,- .
,
, .
- ,
- ,
,.
,
,: (095) 258-51-84
:
1..
.
.
.
2. - .
Subject of the message: Re: Your application
Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney
Prohibited attachment: your_details.pif
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
2.- Is there any kind of fingerprint to certainly know that grub (and not
another bootloader)is installed in a MBR?
Hmmm... doing something like
dd if=/dev/hda bs=something count=something |grep -i grub
might be useful...
___
Bug-grub mailing
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:18:25PM +0100, Yoshinori Okuji wrote:
--- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in your grub-0.93-win32-iso9660.diff patch and would like
to get it integrated in GRUB CVS.
That is not your task: One who decides if a feature should be added is
I haven't looked at the TODO, but it gives me the impression that there are
too many people interested in having new features in GRUB to be in feature
freeze.
I believe this is detrimental for GRUB wide usage. For example, support
for new filesystems and, to some extent, for non-multiboot
Subject of the message: Re: Approved
Recipient of the message: Susan Sweeney
Prohibited attachment: document_all.pif
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a generic answer for these questions when applied to adding a new
filesystem?
Adding a new filesystem must be conservative as well.
Normally, I don't object to adding a new filesystem, but we must test it
thouroughly before adding it. The
12 matches
Mail list logo