[bug #13606] GRUB should allow Linux command-line256 bytes with boot protocol2.02

2008-08-22 Thread Robert Millan
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #13606 (project grub): There's a new loader now, in loader/i386/linux.c, which for now is only used on coreboot (but is trivial to enable it on i386-pc by editting conf/i386-pc.*). Does it also exhibit this problem?

[Fwd: RE: [bug #22758] grub-2: compile fails with [grub_script.tab.h] Brokenpipe]

2008-08-22 Thread Felix Zielcke
I just saw I sent my reply only to him but not to bug-grub. So here it is. By the way I failed to say that bison 1.875 is from somewhere 2003, whereas bison 2.3 is from 2006 Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[bug #13606] GRUB should allow Linux command-line256 bytes with boot protocol2.02

2008-08-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Follow-up Comment #17, bug #13606 (project grub): There's a new loader now, in loader/i386/linux.c, which for now is only used on coreboot (but is trivial to enable it on i386-pc by editting conf/i386-pc.*). Does it also exhibit this problem? As far as I can see,

[bug #22751] GRUB1.96 fails to recognize more than 4GB of memory

2008-08-22 Thread Felix Zielcke
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22751 (project grub): the 1.96 release is a bit old, can you (or someone else of course) please try this with current SVN ? Maybe this has been already fixed in GRUB or something on Xen changed in the meanwhile so it's not needed anymore.

[bug #23615] EFI memory map size

2008-08-22 Thread David Holloway
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #23615 (project grub): Shouldn't this handled in a way to first query size of the needed memory from EFI and then allocate that memory and then make a new call to take everything and not not play with macros. Yes, that's might thought too.