[bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't

2009-10-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #27874 (project grub): grub-editenv defaults now to /boot/grub/editenv too and it prints that out with --help. Unfortunately this was commited after the 1.97 release was made. I'm not sure about changing the help output for load_env There it's actually $prefix/grubenv

[bug #27874] load_env and save_env default to /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't

2009-10-30 Thread Andreas Kloeckner
URL: Summary: load_env and save_env default to /boot/grub/grubenv, but grub-editenv doesn't Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: inducer Submitted on: Fr 30 Okt 2009 18:06:08 GMT Category:

[bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27863 (project grub): Thanks here too. Without the "=" it just quietly returns a prompt (just like with the "="). But, in fact, on a whim I tried "boot" and it had indeed loaded in the bits. I don't know if it's intended that a kernel load in CLI mode should be absol

[bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27862 (project grub): Yeah, I'm a dinosaur. :-> Anyway, I really doubt people like me need to be well-served in what we remember from the days of the 386. Thanks again for the quick response. ___ Reply to this

[bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command

2009-10-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27862 (project grub): I have no doubts that you used GRUB Legacy more then me ;) Ok I even bothered now to try this actually out. Strange that it really understands kernel=/x The official manual at least tells nothing about this, according to grep '=' grub.texi ___

[bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27862 (project grub): I think I've been using GRUB longer than you... this was the canonical way to specify arguments when VSTa first adopted GRUB. Admittedly, that was a while ago. Still, I hadn't guessed that you folks had not only switched to a different way of spe

[bug #27866] multiboot2 not documented

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27866 (project grub): You might want to look at the link: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-2.en.html#multiboot on the page: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/ This is what punked me. ___ Reply to this it

[bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command

2009-10-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Update of bug #27862 (project grub): Status:None => Invalid Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: For an unknown comman

[bug #27866] multiboot2 not documented

2009-10-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Update of bug #27866 (project grub): Status:None => Duplicate Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Then you didn't look

[bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work

2009-10-30 Thread Felix Zielcke
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #27863 (project grub): As said in the other report already try without the = Then it should work ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #27866] multiboot2 not documented

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
URL: Summary: multiboot2 not documented Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: vandys Submitted on: Fri 30 Oct 2009 03:11:26 PM GMT Category: Documentation Severity: Major

[bug #27863] Block lists and Multiboot no longer work

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
URL: Summary: Block lists and Multiboot no longer work Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: vandys Submitted on: Fri 30 Oct 2009 02:54:44 PM GMT Category: Booting Severity:

[bug #27862] No error message on incorrect command

2009-10-30 Thread Andrew Valencia
URL: Summary: No error message on incorrect command Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: vandys Submitted on: Fri 30 Oct 2009 02:51:14 PM GMT Category: Booting Severity: Ma