On 2011/07/21 10:44 (GMT+0530) Yash Jain composed:
it is still fine if i can use the legacy GRUB to load kernel 2.6.37
The latest releases of openSUSE, Fedora and Mandriva continue to default to,
if not only offer, legacy Grub, meaning choice of bootloader has little or
nothing to do with
On 21.07.2011 12:52, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/07/21 10:44 (GMT+0530) Yash Jain composed:
it is still fine if i can use the legacy GRUB to load kernel 2.6.37
The latest releases of openSUSE, Fedora and Mandriva continue to
default to, if not only offer, legacy Grub, meaning choice of
Update of bug #33785 (project grub):
Status:None = Invalid
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
As this refers to a
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #33762 (project grub):
Judging from the output it looks a lot like an issue with xvda1 w/o xvda which
is fixed upstream. Could you please test the latest upstream?
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #33807 (project grub):
Looks like the grub-install wasn't run correctly (e.g. on wrong drive) or not
at all. Could you rerun it? If this doesn't help please supply the output of
bootinfo script.
___
Reply to this
On 10.01.2011 16:53, Ramon Casellas wrote:
Dear grub maintainers,
A system update with Ubuntu natty triggered a grub error. grub2 in
ubuntu natty (20110106) failed to install on a dmraid
/usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: cannot find a GRUB drive for
Update of bug #33725 (project grub):
Status:None = Wont Fix
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
It would be
