[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #46700 (project grub): > I no longer have time to troubleshoot this, sorry. As you wish. I cannot reproduce it using available environment so assuming this is GRUB bug, it depends on someone having access to the affected system to debug and fix. But it can just as well

[bug #46707] double free when kernel does not match secure boot key

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #46707 (project grub): The code in question (secure boot) is fedora-specific. We don't currently support this functionality upstream. I'll keep the bug open as a reminder to look into it during patch uplift ___ Rep

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #9, bug #46700 (project grub): Try attached patch. I have a theory (file #35787) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: filetree.diff Size:0 KB __

[bug #46691] grub-install always fail when installing into unpartitioned filesystem using blocklist

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #46691 (project grub): This is the 32-bit version of CentOS 7 released at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/i386 :: /etc/centos-release :: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Final) uname -a Linux corvus.five.ten 3.10.0-229.el7.i68

[bug #46707] double free when kernel does not match secure boot key

URL: Summary: double free when kernel does not match secure boot key Project: GNU GRUB Submitted by: torvalds Submitted on: Thu 17 Dec 2015 11:18:26 PM GMT Category: Booting

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #46700 (project grub): This is the version of grub I've used from my gentoo machine: 2.02_beta2-r7. I no longer have time to troubleshoot this, sorry. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #46700 (project grub): What version do you use? You selected beta1 - please test current GIT master. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #46700 (project grub): here's the grub image I'm using (pxelinux -> lnxboot.img -> grub.img) (file #35785) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: grub.img Size:167 KB __

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #46700 (project grub): Now I'm wondering what module should be loaded in order to make grub understand VFAT. Also, I was able to boot via EFI centos 6' grub.efi (v0.97), which found the partition and found the files and booted the system properly. Now in regards to gr

Re: problem grub-install after upgrade in wheezy

17.12.2015 13:39, fred rezkaou пишет: > Hi > > after safe-upgrade in wheezy and upgrade of grub-pc 1.9 > i can't write grub in mbr . > > Thansk for you help > > #/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v > /boot/grub > /usr/sbin/grub-probe : info : Cannot s

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #46700 (project grub): Please show "ls -l" output in GRUB to verify sector size. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent v

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #46700 (project grub): Purely cosmetic? Are you kidding me? The FS is full of files. The machine can't boot. # fdisk -l /dev/sda WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted. Note: sector size is 4096

problem grub-install after upgrade in wheezy

Hi after safe-upgrade in wheezy and upgrade of grub-pc 1.9 i can't write grub in mbr . Thansk for you help #/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub /usr/sbin/grub-probe : info : Cannot stat `/dev/vda', skipping. /usr/sbin/grub-probe : info : c

[bug #46700] AF advanced format drives 4096 sector size are NOT supported

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #46700 (project grub): Do you see any problems that are not purely cosmetic? Ls that you pasted suggest that it mostly worked fine: fs is detected. ___ Reply to this item at: