IMHO, if the design of a software package sucks, it isn't worth
improving, even if the implementation is elegant, beautiful, simple,
and smart. Especially when the goal is different from yours, there is
no point where you can contribute.
That's why I started BugCommunicator. I surveyed some
I don't think that is so convenient, because you cannot see what any
menu entry has on the top-level menu.
I see my misunderstanding: I was under the impression that the user
was already at the listing of a boot script and the problem was which
line in the script to edit.
The following patch lets users to directly edit the kernel command line
by pressing 'a' at the grub menu. This makes it significantly easier
for users to do things such as boot in single user mode or pass kernel
options for debugging.
Honestly, I'm not very fascinated with this kind
Is it possible to add the `[bug-grub]' string in the
subjects by the mailing system, as many other projects
do ( [parisc-linux], [uClinux], [eepro100],
[Etherboot-developers], etc).
No, please do not.
In my oppinion is
it a convenient way to better overlook a big amount of
mails.
Hi,
Trying to compile on the hurd yielded some error messages during the build.
I was using the CVS version which compiles fine under GNU/Linux.
I have included a snipped output of make. I can send the whole file if
needed.
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
Your Makefile seems to be quite broken. Didn't you run (an invalid
version of) automake yourself?
I ran 2.13 on both the hurd and the linux box (both are debian systems).
Do one still need to apply the patch to autoconf?
Thanks,
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts
options to both. Either way, can you get grub to compile on the
hurd?
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
I don't know, but I'm sure that your problem is not related to Hurd.
Ok, thanks.
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org
suggestion. The reason why I forced GRUB to remove
it after parsing it was that I just didn't know if the kernel would
ignore the option mildly. I'll get rid of the deletion code.
Okuji
--
Neal H Walfield
this scenario into the documentation, too, but
I'm not sure where to put it.
Maybe have a toplevel section called security?
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University
y removing or renaming your configuration file. As the
document says, GRUB will fall back to the command-line interface if it
is not found.
Okuji
--
--------
Neal H Walfield[EMAIL
ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/grub/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.225
diff -u -r1.225 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2000/04/29 16:30:13 1.225
+++ ChangeLog 2000/04/29 22:34:41
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+2000-04-29 Neal H Walfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * stage2/
Hi,
I consider 'lock' to be just fine as there is no notion of
'identity' inside GRUB. It simply is a 'locked' entry
that needs to get 'unlocked' with a password as the 'key'
- right? Maybe 'locked', or 'protected' then - no idea
which is better. The 'privileged' thing is not suitable
IMHO
13 matches
Mail list logo
