Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Molle Bestefich wrote: That would make my life a lot easier! On the other hand, the most straight forward thing to do would be to move the stage 1.5 to another default sector. So you can not forget to set any option that ruins your array if missing. Also there is no need to add some autodetection

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-21 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Chris Nicola wrote: Yes I am having the exact same problem. I am actually just going to try and lower version of grub for now but I will try this patch if that still happens. Just did this: == grub device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf grub root (hd0,5)/boot Filesystem type is

hpt raid controllers

2003-04-05 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
the grub info page to find the correct parameters to specify the real location of stage 1.5. bye, Wilfried -- BSc Ing. Wilfried Weissmann mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Innrain 70/19 6020 InnsbruckMobil: +43 676 944 44 65

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-30 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Wilfried Weissmann wrote: Hi! I think there is somewhere still a bug in the grub code (v 0.90). I am still facing problems when the unix-grub-shell tries to find some files. The oddity is that when I put as a bootloader on a floppy then I can access files without any trouble. I have

[zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-26 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Hi! I think there is somewhere still a bug in the grub code (v 0.90). I am still facing problems when the unix-grub-shell tries to find some files. The oddity is that when I put as a bootloader on a floppy then I can access files without any trouble. I have observed that the under unix the