From: Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: 15 Jun 2001 09:49:01 -0600
As one of the people involved in the (several) migrations, could you
explain what was irritating about them?
1. They (including you) didn't ask me about
OKUJI Yoshinori writes:
OY It's because the FSF decided that all GNU projects should move to
OY Savannah with no agreement. That was really radical and
OY irritating for me, so I have little will to update the web pages
OY for their selfish reasons.
As one of the people involved in the
From: Jason Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Re: an estimated date of 0.90
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:38:07 +1000
On that note would having automated cvs snapshots available for
download, or at least manual ones at points were you guys think its
stable, be a solution rather
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:53:07PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
I would think
alot of people know little about using CVS or even how to get to it from
your page, I know it took me a while to find it.
It's because the FSF decided that all GNU projects should move to
Savannah with no
No probs here, you just make up a tarball and I'll package it for
debian, I'm already using a cvs snapshot I took myself, so there should
not be any changes at my end.
On that note would having automated cvs snapshots available for
download, or at least manual ones at points were you guys think
