Update of bug #38035 (project grub):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #6:
Well doesn't look like
2013/1/21 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:37:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 20.01.2013 22:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:26:58 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 21.01.2013 05:08, Michael Chang wrote:
2013/1/21 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:37:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 20.01.2013 22:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:26:58 +0100
Vladimir
2013/1/22 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com:
On 21.01.2013 05:08, Michael Chang wrote:
2013/1/21 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:37:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 20.01.2013 22:33, Andrey Borzenkov
On 22.01.2013 06:18, Michael Chang wrote:
2013/1/22 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com:
On 21.01.2013 05:08, Michael Chang wrote:
2013/1/21 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:37:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com
On 09.01.2013 22:31, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38035 (project grub):
I will commit the patch but I want first to be sure that bigger problem behind
this patch is adressed. There are other cases when the numbering doesn't match
e.g. in presence of solaris or BSD
On 20.01.2013 22:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:26:58 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 09.01.2013 22:31, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38035 (project grub):
I will commit the patch but I want first to be
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:26:58 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 09.01.2013 22:31, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38035 (project grub):
I will commit the patch but I want first to be sure that bigger problem
behind
this
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:37:26 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 20.01.2013 22:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:26:58 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 09.01.2013 22:31, Vladimir Serbinenko
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #38035 (project grub):
Why and where do you rely on partition numbers at all? They are not guaranteed
to match Linux or any other OS numbering scheme.
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #38035 (project grub):
And please remove --skip-fs-probe. It's not intended to be used automatically.
It's only after huan intervention and check that it can be used or you risk
overwriting data.
___
Reply to this
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #38035 (project grub):
And never call grub-install with '(hd0,X)' notation. It's wrong and if it
still works it would be because nobody cared to remove it.
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38035 (project grub):
I will commit the patch but I want first to be sure that bigger problem behind
this patch is adressed. There are other cases when the numbering doesn't match
e.g. in presence of solaris or BSD partitions.
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #38035 (project grub):
So while there is a cosmetic problem in GRUB, the real problem is that yast
uses 'hdX,Y' rather than giving device.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38035
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38035
Summary: Off by one error in enumerating MSDOS partitions
Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted by: arvidjaar
Submitted on: Mon 07 Jan 2013 02:24:39 PM GMT
Category: Disk amp; Partition
15 matches
Mail list logo
