]
Subject: 0.94 will appear soon
I'm making effort on a new version of GRUB. I have applied several
patches from contributors (thanks!) to the CVS. I'd appreciate if you
could test the current CVS version. If it is reliable, I can
release it very soon.
I give up two important patches
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 11:10, Treutwein Bernhard wrote:
there has been the patch by Leonid Lisovskiy for ISO9660
El Torito - No Emulation boot for 0.93 (sorrily not for
the cvs tree). See
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-grub/2003-04/msg00014.html
and
Hi there,
On Sunday 18 January 2004 20:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Is there a (preliminary) list of changes since 0.93?
See NEWS, ChangeLog, CVS log messages, etc.
Alright, I'll have to check those files them. Do I have to
go to the cvs for them, or are they (for 0.94) on the web?
On Sunday 18 January 2004 20:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Is there a (preliminary) list of changes since 0.93?
See NEWS, ChangeLog, CVS log messages, etc.
* I just stumbled on this code (in 0.93), netboot/timer.c.
-
unsigned long currticks(void)
{
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* I just stumbled on this code (in 0.93), netboot/timer.c.
-
unsigned long currticks(void)
{
static unsigned long clocks_per_tick;
unsigned long clocks_high, clocks_low;
unsigned long currticks;
if
clock_per_tick is declared as static but not given a constant value.
But as it is static it is therefore automatically given a value of 0.
So, it is in fact a definition, I.E. It is automatically give a value of
0 (unless specifically given a different value) the first time one calls
the
I'm making effort on a new version of GRUB. I have applied several
snip
Okuji
Good news, indeed!
A couple of questions, as I'm hacking on grub integration into my own
development board
* Is there a (preliminary) list of changes since 0.93?
* I just stumbled on this code (in 0.93),
