From: OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot write stage2
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:15:27 +0900
> I was wondering if debug_fs_func (currently, disk_read_func) was
> really necessary. If it is not needed, it is better to remove the
> variable than to rename
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot write stage2
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:15:19 +0400 (EEST)
> What is needed is a function (disk_read_hook) and a variable (I've named
> it disk_read_file) indicating that the sectors being read belong to the
> file
Hello, OKUJI!
> > Well, I've rewritten it.
>
> Thank you very much! You are a very nice guy. :)
You have renamed debug_fs_func to disk_read_func
I think it's not necessary to have two function for the same purpose.
What is needed is a function (disk_read_hook) and a variable (I've named
it d
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot write stage2
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:08:47 +0400 (EEST)
> Well, I've rewritten it.
Thank you very much! You are a very nice guy. :)
> Also Stage1 will be written after Stage2, so that unsuccessful patching
> of
Hello, OKUJI!
> I don't want to reject your patch again and again, but I don't like
> the second solution, because the name "blocklist_func" does not
> repesent what it really does. I think that if it's enough to set a
> variable only once, it should be set only once. Thus, I don't like the
> p
From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cannot write stage2
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 03:13:53 +0400 (EEST)
> As usually, the life is not trivial :-)
Exactly. :-(
> Either we should introduce another debug_fs function for the first
> sector of Stage2
Hello!
The current GRUB cannot write Stage2 on the "install" command.
This happens because stage2_sect is not calculated properly.
As usually, the life is not trivial :-)
Either we should introduce another debug_fs function for the first
sector of Stage2 or the existing debug_fs_bloc
