Re: CDROM support (was: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support)

2001-01-23 Thread Stefan Ondrejicka
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm the author of SBM, could you please mail me all of your patch? (Ofcourse if you don't mind:-) Yep, I forgot to attach the second patch. So here it is. It is just inserted few ret's in procedures which I wanted to disable. And, I'll

CDROM support (was: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support)

2001-01-22 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:00:59AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: ... I must admit that their version is quite interesting and they hired a good hacker! Basically, their main changes from 0.5.94 are: ... * Add CDROM support (although it seems not to work correctly because of buggy

Re: CDROM support (was: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support)

2001-01-22 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CDROM support (was: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:57:50 +0100 I thought that simply loading that code chain-booting would work, but I get an error like "unknown exe format". So what's the p

Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support

2001-01-17 Thread David Welch
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Thierry DELHAISE wrote: Does someone have made some test to see if PE executable can be Multiboot Compliant ? Yes, it's possible using the aout kludge mechanism and a linker script so move the export tables before the BSS.

RE: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support

2001-01-17 Thread Thierry DELHAISE
: mercredi 17 janvier 2001 18:01 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support From: "Jochen Hoenicke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:11:14 +0100 (MET)

RE: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support

2001-01-17 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: "Thierry DELHAISE" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TR: VFAT, NTFS, PE executable support Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:46:44 +0100 Does this work is part of the original GRUB tree now ? No. I said "their version" but not "our version". Do we have to ask them a