RE: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-23 Thread Treutwein Bernhard
> > Hrm. I can see that would work, now.. > Thanks for the tip, which renders my patch useless :-p. > (Nah, the patch makes the stage2 simulator work with > device-mapped devices, so I guess it can still be used for > those... without a floppy disk? Or on a remote terminal.. or > something :

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Molle Bestefich wrote: That would make my life a lot easier! On the other hand, the most straight forward thing to do would be to move the stage 1.5 to another default sector. So you can not forget to set any option that ruins your array if missing. Also there is no need to add some autodetection c

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Molle Bestefich
>> Thanks for the explanation! >> There should be an option in the GRUB configuration to do this, so >> that the RAID won't get overwritten the next time I do a grub-install, >> I think. > > That would make my life a lot easier! On the other hand, the most > straight forward thing to do would be t

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Molle Bestefich wrote: Wilfried Weissmann wrote: It must be severely broken; since if it just sticked to writing to the device I pointed it at (hpt37x_ehgjaggaf) which is a RAID0 "virtual disk" / whatever, it should never be able to overwrite metadata out on the physical disk. HPT desided to make t

Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Molle Bestefich
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Um, GRUB works fine for me, even on totally crazy RAID systems not yet > supported by dmraid. There is a well-kept secret you need to know: > You can install GRUB just fine IFF you boot from a GRUB boot floppy. > NEVER (except for trivial configurations) use the GRUB

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-22 Thread Molle Bestefich
Wilfried Weissmann wrote: >> It must be severely broken; since if it just sticked to writing to the >> device I pointed it at (hpt37x_ehgjaggaf) which is a RAID0 "virtual >> disk" / whatever, it should never be able to overwrite metadata out on >> the physical disk. > > HPT desided to make the met

Re: [dm-devel] Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-21 Thread Wilfried Weissmann
Chris Nicola wrote: Yes I am having the exact same problem. I am actually just going to try and lower version of grub for now but I will try this patch if that still happens. Just did this: == grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf grub> root (hd0,5)/boot Filesystem type is reiser

Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-21 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Molle Bestefich schrieb: > Chris Nicola wrote: > >>Yes I am having the exact same problem. I am actually just going to try >>and lower version of grub for now but I will try this patch if that >>still happens. > > > Just did this: > == > grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf >

Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-21 Thread Molle Bestefich
Chris Nicola wrote: > Yes I am having the exact same problem. I am actually just going to try > and lower version of grub for now but I will try this patch if that > still happens. Just did this: == grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf grub> root (hd0,5)/boot Filesystem type is

Re: grub 0.96 bug

2005-03-21 Thread Molle Bestefich
> grub> device (hd0) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf > grub> device (hd0,5) /dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf6 > grub> root (hd0,5)/boot > Attempt to open drive 0x80 (/dev/mapper/hpt37x_ehgjaggaf6) > Error 5: Partition table invalid or corrupt > grub> root (hd0,5)/boot > Attempt to open drive 0x80 (/dev/ma