From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nbi : what kind of support do you wish ?
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:12:07 +0100
> slightly modified strcmp source taken from GNU libc. There are some
> optimizations in the code that are a benefit for GRUB, and glibc is meant t
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:19:28PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: nbi : what kind of support do you wish ?
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:19:43 +0100
>
>
From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nbi : what kind of support do you wish ?
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:19:43 +0100
> BTW, I'm trying to add a `getopt' function, starting with getopt.c from
> glibc (there is a comment about this need in "builtins.c&
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:22:47AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: nbi : what kind of support do you wish ?
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:12:53 +0100
>
> > or in fact a `nbi' command loading the image (results
From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nbi : what kind of support do you wish ?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:12:53 +0100
> Is it better to add a `nbi' command loading an _etherboot
> bootloader_ (kind of chainloading),
This is a bad strategy. GRUB should
Hello,
I'm still experimenting GRUB and netboot. At the moment, one cannot load a
nbi compliant image. When GRUB loads that kind of image (saying Linux kernel
image made via mknbi-linux), GRUB reports that the image of the kernel is
too big, because of the special format of the image. What do you
