Re: patch - debug X

2003-11-14 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Jim, On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:00:48PM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote: > >>patch.quit: > >> I got annoyed at the error when I do grub> q , > >> enough to try to fix it. > > > >I don't like such a change. > > ok - its not that annoying :-) Okuji doesn't like dirty hacks. Perhaps he'd be satisfi

Re: patch - debug X

2003-11-12 Thread Jim Cromie
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: On Friday 07 November 2003 23:58, Jim Cromie wrote: patch.debug: changes builtin-debug to take an optional numeric argument, and sets accordingly. Argumentless form still toggles. Why do you need this change? I don't see why the command "debug" is useful in

Re: patch - debug X

2003-11-12 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Friday 07 November 2003 23:58, Jim Cromie wrote: > patch.debug: > changes builtin-debug to take an optional numeric argument, > and sets accordingly. Argumentless form still toggles. Why do you need this change? I don't see why the command "debug" is useful in a menu entry. > patch.q

patch - debug X

2003-11-07 Thread Jim Cromie
hi Okuji etal, attached are a few patches; patch.debug: changes builtin-debug to take an optional numeric argument, and sets accordingly. Argumentless form still toggles. ex: title foo debug 1 debug 1 # still on debug # now off This shoul