[I send this message to the list, since I'd like everyone to know what the official maintainer thinks.]
I see Thierry's point about the organization of the source tree and the documentation system. For now, I'm thinking these about the organization: * Making a small libc-like library. Currently GRUB has libc-like functions in char_io.c and somewhere else, but this is bad, because we need to realize if a function is necessary for Stage 1.5 (or diskless images) manually. So it would be better to have many files, one file for each function, create a static library of them, and link GRUB images with the library. * Having arch-dependent directories and a common directory. This is not trivial, as we would want to have, for example, both common commands and arch-dependent commands. I don't have any specific idea about this at the moment. As for the documentation, I don't like WEB personally. I don't like to have a vast amount of comments. It is a Good Thing to have rich comments, but comments must be terse. Lengthy documents are just bothering for hackers, when they read source code. So, write good documents, if possible. But PLEASE don't include them in source files. Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
