Re: guile-doc-snarf bug

From: Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 16:42:47 +0300 guile-doc-snarf passes guile-func-name-check to awk without absolute path. Thus it bails out unless guile-func-name-check is in current direcory. Fix (for guile-doc-snarf 1.16): now fixed in cvs. th

Re: Guile (Developing and Contributing)

Quetzalcoatl Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Repeatable bus error on MacOS X 10.0.2 with guile-1.4 Same on GNU/Linux (segfault instead of bus error, tho). Thanks! 2001-05-10 Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * ports.c (scm_port_revealed, scm_set_port_revealed_x): Only

Re: object->string can lead to scm_mallocated underflow

Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think there is an "scm_mallocated leak" in association with > object->string. oh. thanks for the report, I'll look at this later today. [ the whole approach of making things signed so that (if you are lucky) you can detect overflows stinks.

Re: "skip_scsh_block_comment"

> Where do you see this error message? I can only find > "unterminated `#! ... !#' comment" oh rats, I was going through Snd's error handler, and it printed out the caller's name. ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailm

object->string can lead to scm_mallocated underflow

I think there is an "scm_mallocated leak" in association with object->string. I ran into this while running a long debugging pass that was calling scm_object_to_string millions of times; eventually the program exited at line 1023 in gc.c (where it thinks scm_mallocated has underflowed). In fact,