Masao Uebayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without this, any file can't be compiled because of lack of the
> definition of uintptr_t. uintptr_t is defined in inttypes.h on my
> NetBSD box, but I'm not sure if the proper entry point is it or not.
configure should check for the availability of
Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I use this module with the :rename option and
> `symbol-prefix-proc', the variable `foo' is exported without
> renaming, as shown below:
>
> guile> mgrabmue@tortoise (~): guile
> guile> (use-modules ((test) :rename (symbol-prefix-proc 'modu
Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> guile> (use-modules (ice-9 safe))
>
> Running with GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED=detailed gives tons of
>
> [...]
> (You just re-exported `char-ci>?' from `(ice-9 safe-r5rs)'.)
>
> messages. (Compiling with --disable-deprecated does not work at all
> > Without this, any file can't be compiled because of lack of the
> > definition of uintptr_t. uintptr_t is defined in inttypes.h on my
> > NetBSD box, but I'm not sure if the proper entry point is it or not.
> configure should check for the availability of uintptr_t. What does
> it find on yo
