어제 니가 물어봤던 사이트야.

¾ß ¼úÁ» ±×¸¸ ÀÛÀÛ ¸Ô¾î¶ó..ÀÌ ÁöÁö¹è¾ß... ¾îÁ¦ Àß µé¾î°¬´Ï? ¾îÁ¦ ´Ï°¡ ¹°¾îºÃ´ø »çÀÌÆ®¾ß. ³ª ¿ø·¡ ¿î¼¼ °°Àº°Å Àß ¾È¹Ï´Â°Å ¾ËÁã! ¿©±â °¡º¸´Ï±î ³Ñ Àß ¸Â´Â°Å ÀÖÁö! ³» ¾ÆµÚ¶û Æнº¿öµå ³Ö°í µé¾î°¡¼­ ºÁºÁ. ¿äÁò ³»»óȲÀ̶û ¶È°°Áö ¾Ê´Ï? °¡ÀÔ ÇÒ¶ó¸é Ãßõ¾ÆµÚ ³»²¨ ½á¶ó. ¾È¾²¸é µÏÀ½! ±×·¡¾ß Æ÷ÀÎÆ®°¡ 200¿ø½ÎÀÌ

Re: possible goops class redefinition bug

"Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unless I'm making a stupid late-night error, there appears to be a bug > related to Goops class redefinition in Guile 1.5.6 from CVS... Thanks! I have recorded this as bug 'goops-class-redefinition'. _

Re: primitive thunk as goops #:init-thunk causes segv

"Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. When using Goops from the latest 1.5.6 CVS, specifying a primitive > thunk for the #:init-thunk slot property of a class causes a > segmentation violation. Thanks! I have recorded this as bug 'init-thunk-needs-closures'. > [...]> > I don't

Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors

"Neil W. Van Dyke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Currently (latest Guile 1.5.4 from CVS), keyword arguments to the Goops > "make" method that are not handled do not generate errors. > > Unless I misunderstand the way that Goops is to be used, I think that > the default behavior should be to cons

Your Hotel web site is NOT Being SEEN!

 Your Hotel Web Site is NOT Being SEEN WHY? NO ONE CAN FIND IT!   YOUR web site is NOT on many search engines and at the Bottom of their listings and as a result   YOU are LOSING customers who cannot find you!   Can this be changed? YES!Regal Telecom For ONLY £79.97   We will submit your web