"Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> If you want to use an operator which is common for numbers and :s,
> why don't you want to use a common zero? If you don't, the behavior
> of the operator will be inconsistent.
For multiply by 0, I can sort of think of cases when the return type
2006/12/1, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
SZAVAI Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (use-modules (oop goops))
> (define-class ())
> (define-method (* a (b )) #t)
> (* 0 (make ))
> ==> 0
Thanks, that's a bug.
Are you sure?
If you want to use an operator which is common for numbers and :s,
Szavai Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (let ((b (make-shared-array #(1) (lambda (x) '(0)) 2)))
Thanks, though I'm not sure that's supposed to work. I suspect you're
not meant to make parts of the old array appear in more than one place
in the new array. Perhaps Marius can say what the inte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> BTW, it would be helpful if you could provide a ChangeLog entry or a
> short sentence explaining the fix you propose.
(Copyright assignment will be needed for more than about 15 lines
cumulative ... which often makes just a pointer to the offending p
SZAVAI Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (use-modules (oop goops))
> (define-class ())
> (define-method (* a (b )) #t)
> (* 0 (make ))
> ==> 0
Thanks, that's a bug.
> - switch (xx)
> - {
> -case 0: return x; break;
> -case 1: return y; break;
> - }
> -
Thoug
Ludovic Courtès írta:
Thanks for all these bug fixes! Note that I'm waiting for a few more
days so that I (or someone else) can review all of them in a row. ;-)
I have these fixes, so don't hurry for me. ;-)
BTW, it would be helpful if you could provide a ChangeLog entry or a
short sente
