Re: bug in stackchk.h

2010-01-17 Thread Ivan Shcherbakov
Hi, Neil, >That all makes sense, but are you seeing this problem in practice? Yes, it caused false positives on a MSYS (Windows) build of guile. -- Best regards, Ivan Shcherbakov mailto:shcherba...@eit.uni-kl.de TU Kaiserslautern, Germany Department of Real-Time Systems

Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't.

2010-01-17 Thread Neil Jerram
Andy Wingo writes: > On Sat 09 Jan 2010 14:28, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > >> +# `GC_dump' is available in GC 6.8 but not declared. > > Neil, you also compile with pre-7.x, no? Do we need to support this? No, I use 7.1. I thought I recalled Ludo saying that we need at least that, but I see from

Re: bug in stackchk.h

2010-01-17 Thread Neil Jerram
Ivan Shcherbakov writes: > Hi, All, > > There is a bug in libguile/stackchk.h file. In some cases, when > integer value of the stack pointer is less than stack checking limit, > false positives are produced. > > The following code is responsible for the problem: > # define SCM_STACK_OV

Re: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.

2010-01-17 Thread Andy Wingo
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 12:04, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () Andy Wingo > () Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:06:23 +0100 > >Yes I tried that one, but it did the wrong thing. > > How about `gnus-summary-pipe-output'? Hm, will try one of those. Thanks for the suggestions :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/